Archives for posts with tag: In dubious battle

On the other hand… letting go, emotionally speaking, may not be as beneficial as advertised.
We might lose some bitterness but we might become more liable to ‘repeat the experience’

As in …

Forgive but don’t forget is a lot easier to be said than done, you know…

Which brings us to:

Do we really need ‘a purpose’?
As in ‘an ideologically determined goal’?
Remember Marx’s “The philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.”. Then the consequences produced by those who had followed Marx’s teachings…
But not only Marx’s!

All set goals which go ‘against the grain’ incur costly consequences.
Which are detrimental to survival! Of the leading trespasser, of those in the following or of those hapless enough to be too close to that particular goal being pursued.
Remember Marx? Nothing unpleasant had happened to him. Not as a consequence of his attempts to change the world! But to others…
Which is equally valid for all other ‘world changers’. Along with all ‘world preservers’ who run along ideologically drawn paths.

Then what should we strive for?
Simply ‘follow the heart’ to achieve ‘peace of mind’?!?
Would that be enough?

Enough for what?!?

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/56083.In_Dubious_Battle

quote-a-nation-that-is-afraid-to-let-its-people-judge-the-truth-and-falsehood-in-an-open-market-is-a-john-f-kennedy-100676

There is undeniable truth in here but there is also a considerable amount of confusion.

Whenever truth is hidden behind the words instead of being openly discussed among those who deal information pertaining to a particular situation all those involved will eventually suffer the consequences of their deceptions.
This is something that has been common knowledge for sometime now yet there still are too many individuals who think they can ‘beat the market’ on this.

This is the true part.

What makes me wonder is how come a nation may become afraid of its own people? Isn’t this an oxymoron of sorts?
Or is it that only some members of that nation have become afraid that their deceptions will become apparent to the rest of the people?

I have used a small strike in an orchard valley as the symbol of man’s eternal, bitter warfare with himself.” (John Steinbeck, in a letter to George Albee)

Why on Earth had Kennedy chosen to beat around the bush instead of speaking out in plain English? It didn’t much good for him anyway, isn’t it?

Why are so many of us still following this policy?
Why are so many nations that allow this to happen?