Archives for posts with tag: Bertrand Russel

The only thing I know is that I know nothing,
and i am not quite sure that i know that.

Socrates

“The demand for certainty is one which is natural to man,
but is nevertheless an intellectual vice.
To endure uncertainty is difficult, but so are most of the other virtues.“

Bertrand Russell

Socrates and Bertrand Russel, both, knew everything there was to be known in their respective times.
Socrates and Bertrand Russel, both, had enough guts to acknowledge their doubts. To themselves and to the rest of us.

On the other hand, Russell presents us with a very interesting riddle.
Is it possible for a naturally occurring thing to become a vice?

““Humans have an affinity for ethanol (plant-derived alcohol), and captive primates are well known to like to drink anthropogenically sourced ethanol,” Dudley told Sciam.com….
The appeal of naturally occurring alcohol has not yet been investigated because, in the handful of previous studies, animals expressed no interest. Anthropologist Katherine Milton of UC Berkeley surveyed primate researchers, working with 22 species, on whether they had seen animals reach for fermented fruit. All said they had not. Scientists at Israel’s Ben Gurion University of the Negev studying bats reported that the animals shunned foods with elevated alcohol concentrations, despite higher sugar levels. Perhaps this is because,  says animal physiologist Berry Pinshow, a co-author of that study, “a drunk bat is a dead bat.””

Cynthia Graber, Scientific American, 2008

Humans, and their pets, also get fat.
Humans – some of them and alone, this time – like to get ‘high’. Exclusively on naturally occurring substances, until recently.

Humans are the only animal species – known to ‘man’ – displaying a certain kind of consciousness. Self-awareness, as defined by Humberto Maturana. Also known as ‘Human Consciousness’.

So, consciousness drove us to become vicious?
To eat too much? To drink alcohol? To use drugs?
To introduce other animals to drugs? In the name of science

The way I see this, consciousness didn’t drive us to become vicious.
Only made it possible.

Being aware of ourselves – being able to observe ourselves ‘in the act’, according to Maturana – has added ‘purpose’ to the whole thing.
Animals do experience pleasure. Pet your pet and then call me a liar.
Animals have even learned from us to ask for pleasure. Many of our pets beg for food and to be petted.
But most wild animals – with the exception of pentailed treeshrews, whatever they might be – shun alcohol. While capable of learning to ‘douse their angst’ from us. In captivity…
Which makes us the only species which has learned to behave viciously on its own. By itself…

To over indulge on purpose.
Do you have a better definition for vice?

Which brings us back to Russell’s “intellectual vice”.

Which intellectual vice does have two aspects.
Overconfidence in one’s own intellectual prowess and over-reliance on other people’s expressed opinions, despite those opinions having a very slim chance of being true. The point being that the second aspect is a ‘simplification’ of the first one. The opinions believed despite being unrealistic do match the biases entertained by the believer.
By the ‘vicious’ believer, albeit the second aspect is less vicious than the first one. Where the overconfident should have known better.

To over-think on purpose.
To convince yourself of your own rectitude… on your own or with the help of others…

Bertrand Russell a fost întrebat cum a început nazismul, iar el a răspuns:
“Întâi i-a fascinat pe proști.
Apoi i-a cenzurat pe cei inteligenți.”

Citeam deunăzi despre rolul ateilor. Pilda era oferita de Rabbi Tzvi Freeman:

‘Credincioșii cred că universul este condus de Dumnezeu. Care știe tot ce se întâmplă și are un motiv pentru toate. Inclusiv pentru toată suferința care există.
Credincioșii au tendința de a spune „Dumnezeu să te ajute. Mă voi ruga pentru tine!”
Ateii, unii dintre ei, pun mâna și fac ceva. Ajută fără să creadă!’

Dar dacă ‘Dumnezeu’ are un rol și pentru cerșetori? Unul oarecum similar cu cel jucat de atei?
Eu cred ca cerșetorii ne oferă prilejul să ne întrebăm : ‘Eu ce fac dacă ajung în situația asta? Cui pot eu să cer ajutor?’

Iar observația făcută de Bertrand Russel răspunde foarte bine la întrebarea ‘CUM a fost posibil să se întâmple așa ceva!’

Pe de altă parte, fascismul și comunismul au apărut doar atunci și acolo unde au fost întrunite condițiile necesare.
Tot un englez, nu-mi aduc aminte numele, a fost întrebat la un moment dat:
‘Ce s-ar fi întâmplat dacă Hitler s-ar fi născut în Anglia?
Nimic, tipul ar fi ajuns la balamuc.’
Atât fascismul cât și comunismul au nevoie, înainte de oportuniștii care să ‘pună în valoare’ circumstanțele, de un clivaj social foarte adânc. De o imensă masă de nemulțumiți!
De un număr suficient de mare de nefericiți care nu văd cum ar putea ieși din situația extrem de neplăcută în care se află.
Adică exact situația în care se aflau Germanii care trăiau în anii 1930. Rușii din timpul primului război mondial. Americanii care credeau că Trump urma să refacă măreția Americii.

Șmecheri care să se pună în fruntea nemulțumiților se vor găsi întotdeauna…
Nemulțumirea să fie suficientă!