One of the hardest decisions an agent gets to make is to choose between
and
Otherwise put, are we to allow evolution to proceed?
The post continues after this message:
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
As much as I love writing, I do have to eat.
And to provide for my family.
Earning money takes time.
If you’d like me to write more, and on a more regular basis, hit the button.
Your contribution will be appreciated!
Another very efficient way to help would be to share my posts.
As much as I love writing, I do have to eat.
And to provide for my family.
Earning money takes time.
If you’d like me to write more, and on a more regular basis, hit the button.
Your contribution will be appreciated!
As much as I love writing, I do have to eat.
And to provide for my family.
Earning money takes time.
If you’d like me to write more, and on a more regular basis, hit the button.
Your contribution will be appreciated!
‘Don’t mend it if it’s not broken’ makes perfect sense for something which already exists. And works ‘good enough for us’.
But when you get to make something a second time? Or even the one million-th time?
What keeps you from ‘experimenting’?
If the expected marginal benefits are greater than the potential marginal costs, of course!
nicichiarasa 