Let’s accept for the sake of the argument that an ‘imperialistic and inconsiderate’ civilization (like the western Europeans were during the time of Columbus) manages to reach the technological prowess of being able to travel at velocities higher than the speed of light – otherwise no one would bother to leave their native planet except for a real emergency since building an empire in this circumstances is impractical.
Would you think they would wait for an invitation from us? Or that they would even need one to know that the Earth is a ‘hospitable’ planet?
If ‘they’ are as belligerent as we were, and still are, the Universe would be either divided into at least two empires busily trying to bite each other’s throat or a huge one who continuously gobbles up new and new planets.
We are still free after so many eons since the galaxy has been in place so chances are that either ‘they’ are a lot more peaceful or interstellar travel is not a feasible thing. Not in any recognizable – by us – form of animal life, anyway.
What we are left with is another, and for me a lot more plausible, hypothesis.
Long range travel has indeed been mastered, in one form or another. After a prolonged interstellar war or even from the very beginning the ‘travelers’ have understood that peace is a lot more ‘profitable’/nice/cozy than generalized war so they don’t allow ‘beligerant’ civilizations to get out of their planets until the would be new-comers ‘grow up’ from their ‘waring’ pubescence.
For instance by installing monitoring stations around ‘promising’ planets and actually sabotaging their efforts at ‘conquering the space’ until they reach a comprehensively peaceful stage of social development.
I remember that one of the conditions for Romania to be accepted in both European Union and NATO was for it to have good relations/’friendship treaties’ with all its neighbors. If we were wise enough to do such thing don’t you think that a civilization that has mastered space travel should have reached the same conclusion way back in their development?
It seems that our fright about the ‘aliens’ tells more about the way we are than about anything else…


A more fundamental consequence of evolved intelligence is directly proportional to a species capable of interstellar travel. The reasoning for this is clear: If interstellar travel is a capability reserved only for species of such advancement, then their advancement is also proof of the understanding for sustainable activity. Further to that, their current existence would require their unconditional adoption of sustainable activity as a result of surviving any possible activity seen as unsustainable.
To attain such a level of advancement for the sole purpose of raping other populated worlds is both counterintuitive and contradictory to intelligent life of that level — not just ignorant to the vast resources available to unpopulated planets, but from the universal constant the entropic model of civilization places on any species.
What would it say if such advanced life maintained such an unsustainable culture — and somehow existed long enough to develop interstellar travel? It would be a contradiction not unlike “Bruce Almighty” materializing a sports car rather than teleporting to the desired location. It would suggest the advancement was stumbled upon — found under a rock, and thus intellectually unfit in knowing what best to do with it.
An advanced civilization is proportionate to their grasp of sustainable activity, and not subject to the definitions of a lesser civilization who’s leaders still value unsustainable activity currently threatening it’s existence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My point exactly!
LikeLiked by 1 person